fbpx

Fall in property prices foreseeable so consultants liable for damages

On behalf of Attwaters Jameson Hill posted in Uncategorised on Thursday, August 14th, 2014

The Court of Appeal has held that the fall in property prices in the recession was “reasonably foreseeable” so a farmer can seek damages of up to £398,000 from engineering consultants who delayed work on a development by 15 months.

The Court of Appeal has held that the fall in property prices in the recession was “reasonably foreseeable” so a farmer can seek damages of up to £398,000 from engineering consultants who delayed work on a development by 15 months.

The case involved a farmer who obtained planning permission to build houses on a field next to an A road in 2006. He engaged a firm of consultants to design a service road and drainage system which would meet with local authority approval.

It was a requirement of the contract that the work should be completed by March 2007. Problems arose so the farmer hired another firm of engineers in April 2008 and the road was finally approved by the council in June 2008 – 15 months after the intended completion date.

The consultants successfully claimed for unpaid fees. However, the judge also allowed the farmer’s counterclaim for damages for the decline in value due to the fall in property prices during the period of delay caused by the consultants’ failure to complete their work on time.

The judge rejected the consultants’ argument that the loss had not been reasonably foreseeable.

The fall in value was estimated at £398,000. However, the judge said the precise loss would be assessed at another hearing as he was only dealing with the legal principle.

The Court of Appeal has now upheld the judge’s decision. It said he had correctly considered whether losses on the property market over a 15 month period were reasonably foreseeable and concluded that they were. His approach and principles could not be faulted.

There had been no evidence before the judge to suggest that there was a general understanding in the property world that anyone in the consultants’ position would not be responsible for losses where there had been delay or breach of contract.

If you require advice speak to a member of our commercial team today on 01279 638888 or email

Awards and Accolades

  • acn clinical negligence
  • acn conveyancing quality
  • acn family law
  • The Legal 500 – The Clients Guide to Law Firms
  • ERC Endorsement
  • Lexcel
  • AVMA
  • SCIL
  • SFE_FAM